Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Murray Kubler vs Ryan Peniston Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kubler vs Peniston analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Murray Kubler vs Ryan Peniston Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kubler 1 - 0 Peniston
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kubler has won 46.15% of points on their second serve, while Peniston has won 51.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kubler, in recent form, has won 53.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peniston has won 52.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.58% and 26.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kubler has saved 53.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peniston has saved 42.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kubler has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 10/ 9), with Peniston winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Kubler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 7/ 1), where as Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kubler winning 1 times and Peniston being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kubler winning 2 and Peniston winning 0. The last match between Kubler and Peniston was at the Surbiton Challenger, 07-06-2023, Second, Grass with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kubler and Peniston have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kubler winning 0 times and Peniston 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kubler winning 1, and Peniston 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kubler has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.16 while Peniston has played against players with an average rank of 238.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kubler has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peniston has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kubler has converted 32.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peniston has converted 32.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
209
Rank
63
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
215
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
67% (407-204)
Career Total W/L
61% (287-187)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
30% (3-7)
$1,200,795
Career Prize Money
$221,850
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:11 | 2:0:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (51/82) | 66% (45/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (36/51) | 67% (30/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (17/31) | 52% (12/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (26/68) | 35% (29/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 41% (9/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (42/49) | 46% (94/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:55:34 | 1:46:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 48 | 224.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (193/297) | 56% (340/604) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (122/193) | 69% (236/340) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (48/104) | 52% (136/264) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (12/37) | 32% (18/56) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (123/318) | 37% (256/696) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
68%
(
137 of
202)
1st Serve %
62%
(
109 of
175)
16
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
90 of
137)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
71 of
109)
43%
(
28 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
84 of
202)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
71 of
175)
189
Total Points Won
188
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hugo Gaston
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
67%
(
92 of
137)
1st Serve %
55%
(
77 of
140)
30
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
11
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
40 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
148
Total Points Won
129
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Ugo Humbert
66%
(
104 of
157)
1st Serve %
57%
(
77 of
135)
10
Aces
24
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
62 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
135)
147
Total Points Won
145
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kubler Vs Peniston Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
